Demonstration of the Effects of Verbal Stimulus Control
The "Clever Hands" Effect
Create a series of 20 to 30 "yes-no" questions to be presented verbally. Half should be very easy: "Does a triangle have three-sides?" Half should be so difficult or obscure that no one is likely know the answers: "Did the Baron of Merchiston invent logarithms?" Alternate the easy and hard questions. Tell the class to listen carefully and think about each question as it is asked, but then write either "yes" or "no" in response completely randomly, entirely irrespective of the content of the question, trying not to make a predictable pattern of "yes" or "no."
Grade the answers. You'll see about 50% correct for the hard questions and about 75% correct for the easy questions. All of this occurs despite the previous explicit instructions to the subjects to answer randomly. The results show how difficult it is, nearly impossible, for observers to avoid unconsciously biasing their responses. For "treatments" that claim to establish pointing-based communication in people who are non-verbal, such as "Facilitated Communication," "Rapid Prompting," and "Informative Pointing," the implications of this effect could not be more clear. It is unlikely that the communication aide or facilitator can simply decide or "will themselves" to avoid controlling the typed of the supposed "communicator."