| AB |
 |
The
AB Design can be used to quickly assess the
effects of an experimental variable. Its main disadvantage
its inability to distinguish the experimental effect from possible
confounds that might occur coincident with the change of condition.
A standard variation of the AB is the BA design in which a
treatment
is
withdrawn
to
determine
its
effectiveness.
Traditional psychologists call the AB design the "interrupted
time-series design." |
ABA
or
REVERSAL |
 |
The
ABA or Reversal Design demonstrates the effect
of the experimental variable by repeatedly introducing and
withdrawing the experimental variable. Confidence in the demonstration
of
experimental control arises from the fact that confounds are
unlikely to occur repeatedly at the same times as the experimental
variable. The reversal design can be extended indefinitely.
A standard variation is the BAB design. The main disadvantage
of
the ABA design is its inability to be used with variables with
irreversible effects or when it is undesirable to return to
a baseline condition for practical or ethical reasons. |
MULTIPLE
SEQUENTIAL
WITHDRAWAL |
 |
The
Multiple Sequential Withdrawal Design is a
variation on the reversal design. It is used to separate the
effects of
each component of a compound independent variable. The components
are presented individually and in combinations to determine
their effects. Any number of components can be examined. The
main disadvantages of the multiple sequential withdrawal design
is the inability of the design to deal with variables with
irreversible effects, the length of time required to examine
several components, and difficulty interpreting order and interaction
effects. |
CHANGING
CRITERION |
 |
The
Changing Criterion Design is used to determine
the effects of an independent variable when the final version
of the target behavior cannot be emitted initially. Experimental
control is demonstrated by the repeated changes in the dependent
measure as the criterion is changed. The steps in the changing
criterion design must be large enough to clearly show the effects
of the independent variable, but not so large that the subject
cannot meet the changed criterion. |
ALTERNATING
TREATMENTS |
 |
The
Alternating Treatments Design is used to directly
compare the effects of two or more different experimental variables
across the same span of time in the same subject. It is also
known as the multiple schedule design.It is also highly effective
in controlling for systematic changes in the subject or setting
across time. Its main disadvantages are (1) its inability to
deal with irreversible effects, (2) potential generalization
from one condition to the other, and (3) interpretation problems
due a variety of interaction, carryover, and order effects. |
|
MULTIPLE
BASELINE |
 |
The
Multiple Baseline Design is used when a return
to baseline is undesirable. Experimental control is demonstrated
by the repeated changes in the dependent variable with each successive
introduction of the independent variable. It protects against
the inability of AB - type designs to demonstrate unequivocal
control by the independent variable by showing the effects at
different times. It is unlikely that a confound could repeatedly
coincide with the introduction of the experimental variable.
The effects of a confounding variable would be seen as a change
in the behavior in all three baselines at the same time. The
multiple baseline can be used across different subjects, settings,
or responses. A standard variation of the design is the Staggered-Start
Design in which a series of AB designs with equally long baselines
are started at successive, overlapping times. If the target behavior
is not irreversible, combining the multiple-baseline and reversal
designs produces a highly effective demonstration of experimental
control with multiple subjects, settings, or responses. The main
disadvantage of the multiple baseline design is that a high degree
of planning is required to produce a successful implementation. |